London (Second Edition): build, destroy, rebuild

After the Great London fire of 1666, the top minds of London have turned to you for help. It’s time to stop what you’re doing and become the most prestigious English architect of all time.

Designer: Martin Wallace

Publisher: Osprey Games

Building it up

It’s a rite of passage to play with dominoes.

Spending minutes meticulously setting up each domino an inch apart. Tapping one end and watching in anticipation and excitement as one hits the other, hits the other, until they’re all knocked down. Then, starting all over again.

Now, instead of dominoes imagine you’re building 17th century architecture.

You do this by spending turns placing cards from your hand into a row of buildings in front of you. This sometimes costs money, but always costs you a card of a matching colour. Which is discarded to the market. Available for anyone to pick up on their next turn.

When you’re satisfied with your building row, you can spend a turn to run it. Allowing you to activate all of the buildings you’ve put down. In any order. Paying their activation costs. For the majority of cards this is also when you say goodbye. As once activated they are flipped over, and will be deactivated for the rest of the game.

However, a running, thriving city brings people looking for work. Unless these new arrivals are provided for, poverty will seep in.

This is represented through poverty tokens gained after each run. These are gained for every card in your building row, cards left in your hand, and any loans you’ve taken out. You won’t lose any points for poverty until the end of the game, but it looms heavily over you throughout.

Thankfully, poverty abides zombie rules. Wherein I don’t have to be the fastest runner to survive, I just need to be faster than you. As at the end of the game, whoever has the least amount of poverty, removes all of theirs. Everyone else then reduces their poverty by the same amount.

You continue this cycle of building, running, destroying, gaining poverty and rebuilding until there are no more cards left to draw. Then everyone tallies up their prestige, takes away points for their poverty, and whoever has the most remaining prestige wins.

The market board in London, you can see the Salters, Vinters, Haberdashers, and Regent Street. Currently Green beating red, 14 to 10.
The market in a two player game

Knocking it down

London took me a while to warm up to, it follows a similar pattern of play to other engine builders. Adding cards to an engine, and using cards to pay for cards is straight out of games from the Race for the Galaxy series.

However, London is not an engine builder.

Every time you run your city it sputters to life in a flash of brilliance before spontaneously combusting, forcing you to build it again. This is a far cry from what I enjoy in engine builders. Where you start weak and over the course of the game grow to become a world beater. There is no growth in London beyond what’s currently in front of you. In fact every time you feel comfortable, and build a great combination of cards, the game takes off its white velvet glove and slaps you across the face.

Challenging you to do it again.

Once you get into the groove of knowing the impermanence of everything you do, you begin to enjoy it. Maybe that’s Stockholm syndrome at work, but maybe it’s the other mechanics at play.

Figuring out what to keep and what to get rid of is always a difficult yet interesting decisions to make, and shines again in London. The way poverty creeps into your city, and the decisions you have to make around playing an extra city card, or running when you still have a healthy hand of cards is again interesting and difficult to make.

To make things more compelling is the Buying Land action. Which allows you to buy plots of land all around England, and to gain a semi-permanent power. Allowing you to strategise your next bout of city building. And the development cards which get more powerful throughout the game. Where instead of gaining 4 pounds per money card you’re now getting 7 pounds.

My city from London; two plots of land, 4 poverty, 5 dollars, and 4 developments. East India Company, Fishmongers, Vinters, and Water Works.
What a city looks like

Please, sir, I want some more

A fantastic line from the rulebook:

Money will affect your ability to do things, but is not the goal itself.

It has larger implications on life. But also sums up the struggles you’ll face in London.

You have no steady income, and cannot generate steady income, the money you get fluctuates on card draw and there’s no guarantee you’ll get more. The question then becomes, with this limited supply – what are you going to do? Put it towards solving poverty? Reinvesting into more money? Buying a new plot of land or new development? Or paying off an existing loan? You’ll be guessing, and second guessing, your answer throughout.

While money may be in short supply, you’re always able to take a loan. Of course this may come back to bite you during end game scoring, as it’s very costly in prestige. But similarly to poverty this only becomes an issue if other people aren’t also taking loans.

So to sum up the game so far:

You have no money.

Don’t want to take a loan.

Poverty keeps increasing.

And everything is becoming more expensive.

Are you feeling under pressure yet?

You will.

One of the most brilliant outputs of London‘s design is how it puts you in the pressure cooker with so few resources. Usually, in resource management games you’ll have multiple resources to consider, but in London there’s only two: money and cards. Meaning everything you do with these resources counts, as you won’t get a second chance to spend it.

Showing some of the card art from London in front of  the box.
Does Wren mean smug? Because I hate this guy.

Good show, old chap

Thematically, London nails it making you feel like a right old snob while playing. The artwork is both gorgeous, and time appropriate. The gameplay is grounded, and the cards abilities make sense in the world, like statues which provide no value other than prestige, or Street Lights which cost money to run but reduce poverty because people work longer hours. Osprey Game’s production of the game feeds into this feeling as well with the luxuriously thick, smooth cards, simple minimalist box art and the linen finished board.

London already has a fantastic reputation. So for a lot of people I’m not saying anything new, but for those who haven’t played it, London is a great card game that’s stood the test of time. While my personal preference wants the game to be shorter, and wishes more excitement from the game. It’s still one of the best card games I’ve played, and would gladly play it when asked.

So, if you’re after a game that feels intimate, where you need to work hard under constant pressure to perform. Then I recommend pouring yourself a glass of brandy and donning an attire of monocles, top hats, and white cotton gloves, because London is the game for you.

Chester the corgi standing beside a copy of the board game London.
Why does he never look happy!

Thanks for reading, I’m currently ranking all my board games in a best to worst list. You can see this games’ initial ranking below.

Initial Ranking: 19

Buy now on Amazon!

Do you enjoy stress in your board games?

Even though we play for fun, London‘s introduction of stress makes me feel more engaged with the game. Am I just a workaholic? Or is stress in games something you enjoy as well?

David Norris

Lover of dogs, books, comics, movies, anime, television, video games and most importantly board games. My site is all about the latter, and my journey through the glorious hobby.

4 thoughts on “London (Second Edition): build, destroy, rebuild

  1. I forgot to address your great questions: to me, yes stress, or at least cognitive stress — doing well, figuring out best strategies, management of resources, makes a game more enjoyable. If I play a game and we just sit around and throw cards down and there is no emotional investment, no stress, then I think it is boring. This is partly why I love complex games, I think. They present a challenge. And yet, in a strange way, they reduce my stress because the challenge is so different than the usual cognitive load I am dealing with at work.

    BTW, I heard that the first expansion to Dune: Imperium has just been announced!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. OMG YES! I read that today as well. I’m so excited for the new Dune: Imperium expansion. The changes look pretty interesting, I hope they don’t introduce too much bloat.

      I think that’s a salient point about it being a different kind of stress. Being able to focus fully on a puzzle, or decision and letting the world melt into the background is calming in its own weird way. And the more challenging or stressful the puzzle, the more focus I have to put on it.

      Great comment, thanks Anton!


  2. Dave, nice review. As with Brass, loans often become necessary, and you need to plan ahead to pay them off as well as how to reduce the poverty that you accrue. In that sense, it is a very strategic game as your city grows, and the properties you own get better. I think it gets especially tight with four because there is a knife fight for the best cards on the market, but there are multiple routes to victory, so the game is always changing. I agree the artwork is amazing and really conveys a sense of the times. I’ve played the game with people who spent time living in London, and they loved seeing paintings of landmarks and locations that are still there. Overall, I think London (this is 2nd edition) is a streamlined version of the original game and is a really interesting game to play.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes good point, it is Second Edition. I should have researched the differences between the two editions, but I don’t know what’s changed!

      I felt I could never get a handle on the loans, and could only get into them when I saw my wife going for them. -7 points is a hefty cost for some instant gains! I found it rarely worth it.

      I think in 4 players the fight for money cards would be exactly as you stated: a knife fight. At two it was still really tight on cash.


Test your charisma

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s